symplectic
¶Ù¾±´Ú´Úé°ù±ð²Ô³¦±ð²õ
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédenteProchaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
symplectic [2024/12/02 11:30] – g.m | symplectic [2025/05/04 18:57] (Version actuelle) – g.m | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
===== GeNeSys: Geneva-Neuchâtel Symplectic geometry seminar ===== | ===== GeNeSys: Geneva-Neuchâtel Symplectic geometry seminar ===== | ||
- | **2024, December 6, day, Université de Genève** | + | Ìý |
+ | **2025, May 6, Tuesday, Université de Neuchâtel**Ìý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Marco Golla (Université de Nantes, CNRS) Ìý | ||
+ | 13h00, Salle B217Ìý | ||
+ | Alexander polynomials and symplectic curves in CP^2Ìý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Libgober defined the Alexander polynomial of a (complex) plane projective curve and showed that it detects some Zariski pairs ofcurves: these are curves with the same degree and the same singularities but with non-homeomorphic complements. He also proved that the Alexander polynomial of a curve divides the Alexander polynomial of its link at infinity and the product of Alexander polynomials of the links of its singularities. We extend Libgober' | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Conan Leung (The Chinese AV¶ÌÊÓÆµ of Hong Kong)Ìý | ||
+ | 14h30, Salle B217Ìý | ||
+ | 3d Mirror Symmetry is 2d Mirror SymmetryÌý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | We introduce an approach to study 3d mirror symmetry via 2d mirror symmetry. The main observations are: (1) 3d brane transforms are given by SYZ-type transforms; (2) the exchange of symplectic and complex structures in 2d mirror symmetry induces the exchange of Kähler and equivariant parameters in 3d mirror symmetry; and (3) the functionalities of 2d mirror symmetry control the gluing of 3d mirrors. Ìý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Sobhan Seyfaddini (ETH Zürich)Ìý | ||
+ | 14h30, Salle B217Ìý | ||
+ | Closing Lemmas on Symplectic ManifoldsÌý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Given a diffeomorphism of a manifold, can one perturb it to create a periodic orbit passing through a specified region? This question, first raised in the 1960s, is known as the Closing Lemma. While the problem was resolved positively in C^1 regularity long ago, it remains largely open at higher levels of smoothness. Recent years have seen significant progress in the C^\infty setting, particularly for area-preserving maps on surfaces. In this talk, I will review these developments, | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | **2025, March 24, Monday, Université de Genève**Ìý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Lionel Lang (Gävle)Ìý | ||
+ | 14h00, Salle 01-15Ìý | ||
+ | Logarithmic volumes of holes of hypersurfaces and tropicalization of periodsÌý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Integrating the logaritmic volume form on well chosen discs bounded on hypersurfaces gives a local system of coordinates on the linear system of such hypersurfaces. Surprisingly, | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | Johannes Rau (Universidad de los Andes)Ìý | ||
+ | 16h00, Salle 06-13Ìý | ||
+ | Welschinger-Witt invariantsÌý | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | The " | ||
+ | Ìý | ||
+ | **2024, December 6, Friday, Université de Genève** | ||
Jeffrey Hicks (Edinburgh) | Jeffrey Hicks (Edinburgh) | ||
Ligne 10: | Ligne 47: | ||
In this talk --- which will only use intuition, not techniques from symplectic geometry --- we give a candidate definition of the " | In this talk --- which will only use intuition, not techniques from symplectic geometry --- we give a candidate definition of the " | ||
+ | |||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | |||
+ | Abstract: In this talk I will explain the interpretation of Speyer well-spacedness condition for genus 1 realizability in terms of logarithmic deformation theory and curve singularities given by Ranganathan--Santos-Parker--Wise. I will then discuss how the same ideas can be used to approach the genus 2 realizability problem and the partial results obtained so far for this case. | ||
symplectic.1733135405.txt.gz · Dernière modificationÌý: 2024/12/02 11:30 de g.m